November 29, 2025 | By [Steven Fitzpatrick]
WASHINGTON — For years, a cloud of legal peril hung over Donald Trump. Multiple indictments across different jurisdictions threatened not just his freedom, but his ability to hold office. Yet, in a stunning turn of events this November, the storm has cleared.
As of this week, the President of the United States faces zero pending criminal charges.
The dismissal of the Georgia election interference case on Wednesday marked the final chapter in a legal saga that once seemed destined for the history books. How did we get here? The answer lies in a mix of political reality, legal maneuvering, and the undeniable power of the presidency itself.
Here is a breakdown of how the dominoes fell, one by one.
1. The Federal Cases: The Power of the DOJ
The first major dominoes to topple were the two federal cases brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith: one for alleged election interference leading up to Jan. 6, and another for hoarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago.
- The Reason: These dismissals were largely expected the moment Trump won the 2024 election. For decades, the Department of Justice has held a policy against prosecuting a sitting president, arguing it would unconstitutionally interfere with the executive branch’s duties.
- The Outcome: Shortly after President Trump’s inauguration, the DOJ moved to drop both cases. This wasn’t a ruling on his guilt or innocence, but a procedural reality of his office. The classified documents case had already faced a major hurdle when a judge ruled Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional.
2. The New York “Hush Money” Case: A Conviction in Limbo
This case is the most legally complex. In May 2024, a New York jury convicted Trump of 34 felony counts for falsifying business records. He is, to date, the first former U.S. president to be convicted of a felony.
- The Twist: Despite the conviction, the judge sentenced him in January 2025 to an “unconditional discharge.” This means the conviction remains on his record, but there is no punishment—no jail time, no probation, no fine.
- The Status: The legal battle isn’t entirely over. Trump’s legal team is actively trying to get the conviction itself erased, a fight that was given new life in November when a federal appeals court ordered a reconsideration of moving the case from state to federal court. But for all practical purposes, the threat from this case has been neutralized.
3. The Georgia Case: The Last Domino Falls
For a long time, the Georgia racketeering case was seen as the most dangerous. Unlike federal charges, a president cannot pardon himself for state crimes.
- The Collapse: The case was plagued by issues from the start, most notably the disqualification of District Attorney Fani Willis over a personal relationship with a prosecutor she hired. This stalled the case for months.
- The Dismissal: In November, a new special prosecutor, Pete Skandalakis, was appointed. After reviewing the case, he concluded that prosecuting a sitting president would be impractical and that the core allegations were better suited for a federal venue—a venue that had already closed its doors. On Wednesday, a judge granted his motion to dismiss the entire case.
- The Verdict: “This case should never have been brought,” said Steve Sadow, Trump’s lead attorney in Georgia, celebrating the end of what he called “political persecution.”
The Analysis: A Victory for Executive Power
The vanishing act of Trump’s criminal docket is a profound moment in American legal and political history. It demonstrates the immense protective shield that the presidency provides.
His supporters see this as vindication, proof that the charges were always a politically motivated “witch hunt” that crumbled under scrutiny. His critics see a failure of the justice system, where the most powerful person in the country appears to be above the law.
Regardless of your perspective, the reality is undeniable: President Trump has emerged from the legal wringer not only unscathed but emboldened. With his legal troubles behind him, the path is now clear for him to focus entirely on his second-term agenda, starting with the aggressive new policies he’s already announcing.
What do you think? Does the dismissal of these cases prove they were politically motivated, or does it show a flaw in our justice system when it comes to holding a president accountable? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Leave a Reply